While many countries are still struggling with how to regulate digital assets, Australia has chosen a more proactive and pragmatic path: easing regulations to reduce compliance costs and create a favorable environment for companies to experiment with stablecoins and related digital assets.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has finalized a class relief framework that allows companies to distribute stablecoins and wrapped tokens without needing to obtain a separate Australian Financial Services (AFS) license for each individual product—a process previously considered costly and time-consuming.
This marks a significant shift, as the AFS licensing regime was originally designed for traditional financial products and is poorly suited to the rapid pace of digital asset innovation.
1. Regulatory Changes: A More Flexible Legal Framework and Lower Operating Costs
ASIC’s latest adjustments are not merely technical updates—they effectively rebuild the legal foundation to better align with the rapidly growing digital-asset market. The new policy rests on two core pillars: (1) the formal legalization of omnibus accounts, and (2) class-relief exemptions from the Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence requirement for distributing stablecoins and wrapped tokens.
Both changes substantially reduce operational costs for businesses and create a broader space for experimentation.
1.1. Businesses Are Now Allowed to Use Omnibus Accounts
Within the digital-asset sector, omnibus accounts have long been a practical model many organizations wished to adopt, but lacked clear regulatory guidance. ASIC’s decision to formally authorize their use is a major milestone.
What is an omnibus account?
It is a single shared account (or wallet) in which:
- multiple customers’ assets are held together in one pooled account;
- the service provider must maintain an internal ledger to distinguish each customer’s holdings;
- reconciliation and accuracy fall on the provider, not the blockchain.
What conditions does ASIC impose?
To use an omnibus account for stablecoins and wrapped tokens, businesses must:
- maintain accurate, detailed accounting records,
- perform regular reconciliations to ensure internal balances match on-chain assets,
- implement risk-management processes appropriate for their activity level,
- be able to provide data to regulators upon request.
ASIC’s focus is transparency and traceability—not forcing companies to maintain a separate wallet for every customer, which is costly and difficult to scale.
Practical benefits for businesses
Legalizing omnibus accounts brings three major advantages:
1. Significant reduction in operational costs
Instead of creating and maintaining thousands or millions of individual wallets—each incurring custody, management, and security overhead—companies can operate a consolidated model.
2. Faster transaction processing
Omnibus setups allow providers to:
- batch smaller transactions before sending them on-chain,
- reduce blockchain load,
- accelerate confirmation times, especially during network congestion.
This is critical for stablecoins, which are expected to support near-instant payments.
3. Lower operational risk
Centralized reconciliation helps:
- standardize audit procedures,
- detect discrepancies more easily,
- minimize errors when handling large transaction volumes.
This model has existed for decades in traditional finance—and Australia is now formally adapting it for digital assets.
1.2. Relaxing AFS Licensing Requirements for Stablecoins and Wrapped Tokens
The second major shift is ASIC’s exemption from requiring a dedicated Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence for distributing stablecoins and wrapped tokens.
This change is highly consequential because the AFS regime typically requires:
- high registration and compliance costs,
- rigorous audits and supervision,
- a team with deep expertise in traditional financial products.
Why is easing AFS licensing so important?
1. Lower barriers to market entry
Many digital-asset startups were effectively blocked at step one because they could not meet AFS requirements—rules designed for banks, investment funds, or major financial institutions.
With the exemptions in place, distributing stablecoins and wrapped tokens no longer requires heavy licensing, enabling companies to:
- experiment with new products,
- reach users faster,
- reduce early-stage legal risk.
2. Encouraging traditional businesses to adopt stablecoins
Not only startups, but also:
- payment companies,
- e-commerce platforms,
- fintech providers,
can now integrate stablecoins into their services without fear of being categorized as offering “complex financial services.”
This accelerates the convergence of blockchain and traditional finance, opening space for new applications and business models.
3. A flexible but supervised sandbox environment
Importantly, ASIC is not removing oversight—it is reshaping how oversight works:
- supervision applies to product categories, not individual licences,
- routine internal reporting is required,
- transparency and record-keeping standards remain strict.
Through this approach, Australia:
- lowers regulatory friction,
- maintains market safety,
- and adapts more effectively to the speed of digital-asset innovation.
2. Policy Drivers: The Three “Pull Forces” Behind Australia’s Move to Ease Stablecoin Regulations
To understand why Australia chose to loosen regulations on stablecoins and wrapped tokens, we need to look at three major forces simultaneously pushing the policymaking system. This is not an isolated decision, but a strategic response by a country that wants to keep pace with technological progress while still protecting its domestic market.
Pull Force #1: International Competition in Digital Asset Regulation
Australia is facing intense regional competition in the race to modernize digital finance. Major financial hubs that compete directly with Australia—such as Singapore, Hong Kong, and the UAE—have already introduced crypto-friendly regulatory frameworks to attract Web3 startups, stablecoin issuers, and tokenization companies.
If Australia does not act:
- Businesses will migrate to more favorable jurisdictions,
- Tech talent will be pulled toward competing financial centers,
- Australia risks falling behind in shaping global standards for digital assets.
Easing rules for stablecoins and wrapped tokens is Australia’s response:
=> Australia wants to maintain its position in the Asia–Pacific digital finance value chain.
Pull Force #2: Strong Domestic Demand in the Real Economy
Australia has:
- a highly developed digital payments ecosystem,
- a large immigrant population,
- fast-growing e-commerce,
- an active remittance market.
All of these sectors can benefit directly from stablecoins thanks to:
- lower fees,
- faster settlement,
- no dependence on banking hours,
- cheaper remittances for diaspora communities.
This means the demand for a regulated, stable, and legally recognized stablecoin market does not come only from crypto startups— but also from:
- banks,
- fintech companies,
- immigrant communities,
- payment service providers.
ASIC needs a regulatory environment that allows innovation without suffocating the market.
By relaxing AFS requirements and legalizing omnibus accounts, Australia is essentially saying:
=> “Build, innovate — we will supervise, but we won’t stand in the way.”
Pull Force #3: The Global Stablecoin Market Is Growing Too Fast to Ignore
Today, stablecoins:
- exceed $300 billion in market capitalization,
- have grown 48% in just a few months,
- are being integrated into payment systems by major companies like Stripe, PayPal, and Visa.
This rapid growth forces governments to establish clearer regulatory positions.
If they don’t:
- stablecoins will expand in a regulatory gray zone,
- consumer risks will increase,
- regulators will struggle to intervene when problems occur.
ASIC understands that acting early creates advantages:
- Proactive oversight rather than reactive enforcement,
- Shaping rules before markets become too large to control,
- Aligning with emerging international standards (such as the EU’s MiCA framework).
Loosening rules does not mean deregulation—it means modernizing regulation to match market speed.
=> Australia wants to transform stablecoins from a latent risk into a safe, transparent, and compliant financial infrastructure.
3. Risks & Structural Challenges: A Policy Shift That Still Requires Caution
Although Australia’s new framework is considered progressive and market-friendly, it does not come without risks. By easing regulatory barriers and allowing more experimentation with stablecoins and wrapped tokens, ASIC must now address a series of structural challenges that could emerge as the market expands. These risks do not undermine the reform itself — but they highlight why regulatory flexibility must go hand in hand with careful oversight.
3.1. Oversight Complexity Increases Even as Licensing Requirements Decrease
Removing the requirement for individual AFS licenses significantly reduces friction for businesses, but it also shifts regulatory responsibility upstream. ASIC now must:
- monitor a larger number of market participants,
- evaluate compliance through reporting rather than licensing,
- detect misconduct in a sector that evolves much faster than traditional finance.
The challenge is subtle: When entry barriers fall, the surface area for risk increases. This demands more agile supervisory mechanisms, which ASIC will need to strengthen in the coming years.
3.2. Operational Risks from Omnibus Accounts
While omnibus accounts reduce cost and complexity, they also introduce a systemic concern: internal accounting becomes the single point of truth.
This means:
- if reconciliation fails, customers may not notice discrepancies immediately;
- internal fraud or poor bookkeeping could affect a large pool of users at once;
- disputes become harder to resolve because assets are not segregated on-chain.
ASIC’s rules attempt to mitigate these risks through documentation and audit requirements, but the success of this model depends heavily on:
- the competence of each provider,
- the reliability of their internal systems,
- and the maturity of their risk-management practices.
In other words, legalizing omnibus accounts is efficient — but it shifts trust from the blockchain layer to organisational controls.
3.3. Technological Risk: Stablecoins Depend on Blockchains Australia Does Not Control
Stablecoins and wrapped tokens operate on public blockchains such as Solana, Ethereum, or Polygon. These networks can face:
- congestion,
- downtime,
- smart-contract exploits,
- governance failures.
If such an incident occurs:
- consumers may lose access to funds,
- payment flows could be disrupted,
- ASIC may need to intervene despite having no jurisdiction over the underlying blockchain.
This creates a regulatory paradox:
=> Australia must oversee the risks of systems it does not directly regulate.
The more the domestic economy relies on stablecoins, the more critical this challenge becomes.
3.4. International Misalignment Could Create Cross-Border Compliance Friction
Stablecoin regulation is diverging globally:
- The EU has MiCA (strict licensing, strict capital requirements).
- Singapore emphasises institutional control and custodial safeguards.
- The U.S. still lacks a unified federal framework, leaving uncertainty.
Australia’s lighter-touch, innovation-friendly model may cause:
- incompatibility with foreign regulatory regimes,
- additional compliance burdens for Australian companies operating abroad,
- gaps in consumer protection when cross-border transactions occur.
For stablecoins to become a major part of international payments, regulatory frameworks must eventually converge — something far from guaranteed.
3.5. The Risk of Market Overgrowth and Speculative Misuse
Lower barriers to issuing wrapped tokens and stablecoins may also invite:
- opportunistic or poorly designed products,
- complex synthetic assets with unclear risk profiles,
- speculative behaviour disguised as financial innovation.
If not monitored closely, this could lead to:
- consumer losses,
- reputational damage for the Australian fintech sector,
- regression toward heavier regulation in the future.
ASIC’s challenge will be to support innovation without allowing the market to drift toward the excesses seen in previous crypto cycles.
Disclaimer:The information provided here is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, legal, or professional advice. Always conduct your own research, consider your financial situation, and, if necessary, consult with a licensed professional before making any decisions.
Join MEXC and Get up to $10,000 Bonus!
Sign Up
