Overview: Slowing Public Accumulation in a Volatile 2025
Public companies that hold Bitcoin on their balance sheets have substantially reduced their accumulation pace in recent months. After a period of strong inflows earlier in the year, average daily purchases by these entities hit a 12‑month low in October, and activity decelerated further in early November. This shift reflects a mix of market valuation dynamics, financing considerations, and broader risk reduction across institutional and retail segments.
Key data points
- Average daily BTC purchases by public companies reached roughly 656 BTC in October 2025.
- In the first 10 days of November 2025 the daily average fell by about 42% to roughly 375 BTC.
- Aggregate flows from Bitcoin investment products show notable outflows since a mid‑October deleveraging event, totaling approximately 29,008 BTC in the most recent 30‑day window.
- Approximately half of pure public Bitcoin treasury companies trade at market capitalizations below the net market value of the BTC they hold.
Why accumulation has slowed
Multiple interlinked forces have driven the slowdown in public treasury accumulation:
1. Declining market cap-to-net asset value (mNAV)
For “pure-play” treasury firms, market cap relative to net asset value (mNAV) is a key metric. An mNAV below 1 indicates the market values the company at less than the Bitcoin on its balance sheet. As pricing dynamics shifted during the second half of 2025, many such firms moved from trading at premiums to trading closer to or below NAV.
When shares trade below NAV, the cost of raising new capital rises and equity issuance becomes less attractive. That has a direct effect on a company’s ability or willingness to acquire additional BTC.
2. Collapsed issuance premiums
Earlier in the year, several treasury companies issued equity at meaningful premiums to NAV, raising substantial capital that funded further Bitcoin purchases. As those premiums evaporated, the incentives changed. Some firms have responded by:
- Selling portions of their Bitcoin holdings to meet liquidity needs or fixed obligations.
- Implementing share buyback programs to support mNAV or stabilize trading dynamics.
3. Macro pressures and volatility
Interest rate trends, macroeconomic data, and episodic risk‑on/risk‑off swings in 2025 reduced the appeal of aggressive balance‑sheet leverage for some firms. Higher financing costs and the prospect of increased volatility contributed to a de‑risking posture among several public treasuries.
4. De‑risking after leverage events
A notable deleveraging event in mid‑October triggered a short‑term pullback across many crypto exposure products. Investment vehicles and funds responded by trimming positions, which led to measurable outflows from BTC investment products and reduced spot demand from corporates that might otherwise have added to holdings.
Market structure: discounts, premiums and investor sentiment
Discounts to NAV for public treasury companies are a symptom of deeper market structure shifts. When a large portion of public firms trade below their net asset backing, it affects investor sentiment in several ways:
- Retail and institutional investors may grow cautious about buying equity to gain indirect BTC exposure.
- Short sellers or those employing hedged strategies can exploit price divergences, increasing volatility in individual securities.
- Companies face a trade‑off between issuing new shares at a discount (dilution risk) or funding purchases via alternative methods, including selling BTC holdings.
Investor losses and behavioral effects
During the premium collapse, some new shareholders who bought equity exposure at elevated prices experienced paper losses as values normalized. This has a chilling effect on fresh capital inflows into treasury vehicles, as prospective investors reassess the risk/reward of purchasing equity that tracks Bitcoin indirectly.
In addition, the market saw significant outflows from Bitcoin investment products during the 30‑day period following the mid‑October event—levels not seen since the spring of 2025. While analysts expect some mean reversion, the immediate effect was to reduce aggregate spot demand for BTC and increase selling pressure in the near term.
What this means for Bitcoin price dynamics in late 2025
The reduced spot demand from public treasuries and outflows from investment products create a more fragile demand backdrop compared with the robust accumulation seen earlier in 2025. Key implications include:
- Lower steady‑state buying pressure from corporate treasuries, which can exacerbate drawdowns during risk aversion episodes.
- Increased sensitivity of price to large sellers and leverage unwinds, particularly when mNAVs are compressed and liquidity is thinner.
- Short‑term opportunities for volatility-driven traders, while long‑term holders may view weakness as accumulation windows depending on their conviction in Bitcoin’s fundamentals.
Market outlook and scenarios for H2 2025–2026
Looking ahead, three broad scenarios are plausible depending on macro and on‑chain developments:
1. Stabilization and renewed accumulation
If macro conditions ease (e.g., lower rates or reduced risk premia) and investor sentiment recovers, public treasuries could resume accumulation. A recovery in mNAVs to above‑par levels would make equity issuance more attractive and could re‑establish those entities as material net buyers.
2. Persistent discounting and slower demand
If discounts persist due to continued dilution concerns or structural overhang, many firms may maintain conservative stances—selling to meet obligations or pause buying. This would keep spot demand muted and make Bitcoin more prone to deeper drawdowns on adverse news.
3. Structural reconfiguration
Some market participants may adapt structurally—shifting funding models, consolidating treasury exposures, or launching new product wrappers that better align NAV and share price. Innovation in issuance and capital management could reduce the mNAV gap over time.
Practical considerations for investors in 2025
Given the evolving market dynamics, investors should consider the following approaches:
- Diversify exposure across direct Bitcoin holdings, regulated investment products, and traditional assets to manage idiosyncratic corporate treasury risk.
- Assess the funding model and capital structure of any public treasury company before using its equity as a proxy for BTC exposure.
- Use position sizing and stop‑loss strategies to protect against sudden deleveraging events or valuation gaps.
- Monitor flow data and short‑term indicators—net flows, mNAV trends, and treasury buying—as part of tactical allocation decisions.
Long‑term perspective: why treasuries matter
Despite the near‑term slowdown, public Bitcoin treasuries played a meaningful role in prior market cycles by providing persistent demand during earlier stages of institutional adoption. Their behavior is important because:
- Corporate balance‑sheet demand can provide a structural floor for price over multi‑year horizons.
- Capital markets dynamics—equity issuance, buybacks, and derivative activity—affect how that demand translates into on‑chain purchases.
- Even when public treasury accumulation slows, other sources of demand (miners, long‑term holders, and retail accumulation) continue to shape broader supply/demand balances.
Conclusion
The late‑2025 environment has revealed that public Bitcoin treasuries are sensitive to market valuation dynamics and macro pressures. Average daily purchases declined from roughly 656 BTC in October to about 375 BTC in early November, and investment product outflows have materially reduced short‑term demand.
For investors, the current landscape underscores the importance of careful due diligence when using corporate treasuries as a substitute for direct Bitcoin exposure. Monitoring mNAV trends, capital‑markets activity, and flow data will be critical as markets navigate the remainder of 2025 and beyond. While a return to aggressive accumulation is possible under more favorable conditions, the immediate picture favors prudence and disciplined risk management.
Disclaimer: This post is a compilation of publicly available information.
MEXC does not verify or guarantee the accuracy of third-party content.
Readers should conduct their own research before making any investment or participation decisions.
Join MEXC and Get up to $10,000 Bonus!
Sign Up
