Bitcoin Finds Structural Support Near $80K — 2025 Insight

Overview

Bitcoin staged a robust rebound after a sharp correction from its October highs, finding pronounced support around the low $80,000 range. Several onchain cost-basis indicators converged in this area, signaling concentrated investor demand and conviction. These converging measures are important because they reveal where different market participants — from active traders to large institutional holders — are most likely to defend positions during pullbacks.

Key cost-basis metrics and what they show

Three primary cost-basis measures provided a consistent message as prices held near $80,000. Each metric captures a different slice of market behavior and, together, they create a layered picture of support.

1. Mean cost basis of active supply

This metric tracks the average acquisition price of coins that have moved recently — the supply that is “active” in the market rather than long-term dormant holdings. Because it filters out coins that haven’t changed hands for extended periods, it approximates the cost basis of participants most likely to trade or sell in the short term.

During the recent pullback, the mean cost of active supply settled close to the low $80,000 range and acted as a clear support level. Historically, when prices remain above this active-supply mean, it can indicate a healthy bull-market structure because coins purchased at or above that level are less likely to be sold quickly.

2. U.S. spot ETF inflows and weighted cost basis

The introduction and growth of U.S. spot exchange-traded products has added a new, observable layer of demand. By combining daily net inflows with the prevailing market price, analysts create a weighted cost basis representing the average price at which ETF participants effectively acquired bitcoin.

In the recent correction, the aggregated ETF cost basis clustered near the mid-$80,000s. Price behavior showed a noticeable bounce around that level, suggesting ETF investors’ average entry price became a zone of defensive buying. Given the prominence of institutional and retail flows into spot ETFs in 2025, this cohort’s cost basis now exerts significant influence on support dynamics.

3. Yearly cohort cost basis (2024-acquired supply)

Yearly cohort cost bases track the average price at which coins acquired during a specific year exited exchange custody or changed hands. The 2024 cohort’s weighted cost basis has been a recurrent reference point during 2025 drawdowns, often acting as a structural floor during bullish phases.

For the recent pullback, the 2024 cohort’s cost basis landed in the low-to-mid $80,000 area, reinforcing the other two measures and creating a clustered support band that market participants monitored closely.

Why convergence matters

When multiple independent metrics converge in a tight price range, the result is usually a deeper and more resilient support zone. Convergence implies the presence of different investor types — active traders, ETF holders, and yearly cohorts — all sharing similar acquisition prices. That alignment makes it costlier for sellers to continue liquidating without creating significant losses across a broad set of holders.

• Broader defensive buying: Investors who entered near the same price have incentive to hold or buy more to defend positions.
• Lower likelihood of cascade selling: With diverse cohorts clustered around a band, single-event liquidations are less likely to transit into full-blown capitulation.
• Improved technical reliability: Price tests that bounce at multiple independent cost bases are more credible as meaningful support.

Market context in 2025

The 2025 macro and market backdrop has shaped how these cost-basis levels are interpreted. A few notable themes:

• ETF maturation: Spot ETF adoption accelerated in 2024 and continued to influence flows in 2025. As these products mature, their aggregated cost basis represents a larger share of investible bitcoin, increasing their market impact.
• Macro liquidity and rates: Throughout 2025, central bank policy and liquidity conditions remained central to risk asset correlations. Periods of rate stability or easing supported risk appetite, while rate-tightening windows produced sharper corrections.
• Derivatives and funding dynamics: Futures open interest and funding rate behavior continued to affect price volatility. When funding turned extreme, spot-cost-basis levels were useful reference points for expected mean-reversion targets.
• Institutional adoption: Increased custody solutions and balance-sheet allocations from institutional desks made cost-basis clusters more consequential for large holders.

Implications for traders and investors

The clustered support in the $80,000 region carries several practical implications for market participants.

For longer-term investors

Long-term holders can interpret the convergence as evidence of structural demand. Concentrated acquisition levels across cohorts suggest a base of holders with high conviction. For dollar-cost averaging strategies, the presence of multi-cohort support may lower the urgency of attempting to “time” every pullback.

For active traders and risk managers

Active traders can use the clustered band as a reference for stop placement, position sizing, and scaling entries. The confluence of metrics increases the probability of temporary bounces, making it a logical area for shorter-term long exposure — with disciplined risk controls in place for breakdown scenarios.

For institutions and allocators

Allocators monitoring realized-entry levels across product types (spot, ETFs, OTC fills) can better estimate potential supply sensitivity at different prices. Institutional buyers may choose to scale into exposure when prices dip towards aggregated cost bases, while also preparing liquidity provisions if correlated liquidations occur.

Scenario analysis: upside and downside paths

Understanding how markets might evolve from the support band helps set expectations for both rallies and corrections.

Base-held scenario (bullish continuation)

If price continues to respect the $80,000–$85,000 band, two dynamics may follow:

• Reduced selling pressure as holders reach break-even or minimal loss thresholds.
• Renewed buying from momentum traders who view a successful test as confirmation of trend continuation, potentially driving higher liquidity into long positions.

Breakdown scenario (deeper correction)

In a stress scenario where macro sentiment deteriorates sharply or derivatives deleveraging accelerates, prices could slip below the band. Key considerations include:

• Where the next cohort-level support lies — historical onchain data often highlights prior yearly cohort bases as subsequent anchors.
• The role of exchange liquidity and off-exchange custody; if exchange balances rise, lower prices may be needed to attract sellers.
• How quickly ETF flows change — persistent outflows could widen the path lower.

What to watch next

Market participants should monitor several indicators to gauge the sustainability of the current support band:

• Net flows into spot products: Consistent inflows reinforce the ETF cost basis and can help absorb selling pressure.
• Active-supply movement: Increased movement of historically inactive coins could signal distribution and test the resilience of the support range.
• Funding rates and derivatives positioning: Large imbalances in futures markets often precede rapid price moves and can amplify breakouts or breakdowns.
• Macro headlines: Shifts in interest-rate expectations, liquidity measures, or regulatory developments can alter risk appetite quickly.

Conclusion

The alignment of active-supply mean cost, aggregated spot-product cost basis, and the 2024 yearly cohort cost basis has created a meaningful support cluster near the low $80,000s. In 2025, with ETFs playing an enlarged role and institutional adoption deepening, such convergences carry heightened significance for market structure and risk management.

While no single metric guarantees a trend continuation, the multi-cohort agreement around the same price zone increases the odds that sellers will encounter substantive buying interest there. Traders and investors should combine these onchain cost-basis signals with macro and derivatives indicators to form a comprehensive view of market risk and opportunity.

For further coverage and market tools, visit the MEXC platform for data-driven insights and trading resources: https://www.mexc.com.

Disclaimer: This post is a compilation of publicly available information.
MEXC does not verify or guarantee the accuracy of third-party content.
Readers should conduct their own research before making any investment or participation decisions.