Bitcoin Faces Deeper Downside Risk, Analyst Highlights Key Support Zones

Trader Flags Potential for Larger Bitcoin Decline

Renowned trader Peter Brandt has raised fresh concerns about Bitcoin’s near-term trajectory, pointing to historical patterning on the weekly logarithmic chart that suggests additional downside remains possible. Brandt’s analysis highlights a lower green support band with an upper edge below $70,000 and a lower edge in the mid-$40,000s — indicating a wide range of potential retracement if bearish pressure accelerates.

The commentary arrives amid renewed volatility in 2025 cryptocurrency markets, a year that continues to reflect the intersection of macroeconomic trends, institutional flows and evolving regulatory dynamics.

What Brandt’s Chart Shows

Brandt’s chart emphasizes long-term cyclical behavior, comparing multiple tops and bottoms across the past decade. His interpretation rests on the following visual cues and technical ideas:

• Weekly logarithmic channels that have historically contained major market peaks and troughs.
• An upper limit of the lower channel located under $70K, which Brandt suggests could act as the next material resistance-turned-support level.
• A lower band near the mid-$40K range that represents the deeper downside potential if the prior support bands fail to hold.

While he remains optimistic on Bitcoin’s long-term fundamentals — a view he has reiterated in prior commentary — Brandt has been explicit about the risk of sizable pullbacks before any sustained appreciation resumes.

Market Moves and On-Chain Signals

On the day of Brandt’s latest comments, Bitcoin experienced a notable intraday sell-off that saw prices fall into the mid-$80K region, with trading volumes spiking substantially. This type of activity often reflects rapid repositioning by short-term traders and increased liquidation risk in leveraged derivatives markets.

On-chain indicators and moving averages also feed into the downside narrative:

• Realized price and some versions of long-term trend measures are clustered around the mid-$50K level, offering a historical reference for where realized losses could compress.
• The 200-week moving average (200-WMA), frequently used by investors to assess structural strength, is also near the mid-$50K area — a point many analysts view as meaningful support in prior cycles.

These metrics do not guarantee outcomes, but they provide context for potential support zones that market participants monitor closely.

How 2025 Market Dynamics Are Shaping Risk

Several 2025-specific factors are amplifying sensitivity to downside headlines and technical triggers:

• Post-halving synchronization: With the 2024 halving now in the rearview, the market has entered later stages of a multi-year cycle where volatility commonly increases as the path to a new price equilibrium plays out.
• Institutional balance-sheet considerations: Continued portfolio rebalancing by corporates and funds, combined with periodic tax or treasury-related selling, can magnify price swings during risk-off episodes.
• Macro tightening and carry dynamics: Although interest-rate environments have evolved since the post-pandemic peak in policy rates, 2025 still features ongoing comparisons between yield-bearing assets and non-yielding digital assets like Bitcoin, which can influence equity-like flows.
• Regulatory clarity and product maturation: The maturing institutional ecosystem — from spot exposures to more advanced derivatives — has improved liquidity depth, yet also introduces concentrated flows that can exacerbate directional moves when sentiment shifts.

Historical Context: How Large Can Corrections Be?

Bitcoin’s historical bear markets have produced deep retracements measured from cycle highs. Previous drawdowns have exceeded 70% and, in some cases, 80% from prior peaks. While history does not repeat exactly, it informs risk frameworks and scenario planning for both traders and allocators.

Key takeaways from past cycles include:

• Bear markets often unfold over many months, with violent short-term rallies that can deceive momentum-driven participants.
• Support zones derived from long-term moving averages and realized price tend to attract buying interest, but they are not immune to transient violations.
• On-chain accumulation by long-term holders can cushion declines, but distribution phases among larger holders sometimes coincide with protracted price weakness.

Implications for Traders and Investors

Brandt’s warning underscores a broader cautionary stance for market participants evaluating position size, leverage and time horizon:

• Risk management is paramount. Traders should reassess leverage, set disciplined stop-loss parameters and consider volatility-adjusted position sizing.
• Long-term investors may view deeper pullbacks as accumulation opportunities, but should prepare for multi-month consolidation phases before realizing substantial upside.
• Institutional participants often use layered entry strategies and hedging instruments to navigate elevated uncertainty, reducing the need to commit capital at single price points.

These approaches reflect a balanced playbook: protect capital in the near term while maintaining optionality for potential upside over a multi-year horizon.

Derivatives, Liquidity and Liquidation Risk

Rapid price declines can be amplified by the mechanics of derivatives markets. High leverage in perpetual futures markets, concentrated short interest, and options expiries can all contribute to abrupt price moves.

Market participants should be mindful of:

• Funding rate swings, which can indicate growing pressure from one side of the market.
• Open interest concentrations that may trigger material liquidations if price moves breach common stop bands.
• Options skew and large expiries that can create gamma-driven volatility, especially around key strikes near widely watched support and resistance levels.

What Could Stabilize Prices?

Several developments could help calm markets and reduce downside momentum:

• Renewed buying from long-term holders and institutional entrants can provide support near historically significant levels.
• Positive macro shifts, such as easing financial conditions or clearer regulatory signals, may restore risk appetite toward higher-beta assets.
• Technical stabilization around moving averages and realized-price bands often prompts a re-accumulation phase that precedes renewed rallies.

Absent these stabilizers, technical analysts like Brandt warn that price discovery could trend lower until new buyer interest emerges.

Scenario Planning

Market participants commonly consider a few plausible scenarios:

• Base case: A moderate correction that respects historical support bands and resolves into multi-month consolidation before resuming an uptrend.
• Bear case: A more significant decline toward mid-$40K levels if leveraged selling and institutional liquidations accelerate.
• Bull case: Quick stabilization above the sub-$70K band driven by large-scale accumulation and improved macro conditions.

Bottom Line

Peter Brandt’s latest technical assessment serves as a reminder that even established bullish narratives can coexist with sizable tail risk. In 2025, Bitcoin markets remain subject to an interplay of macro forces, institutional flows and on-chain dynamics that can amplify directional moves.

For traders and investors, the prudent response is not fear-driven paralysis, but disciplined risk management, diversified exposure strategies and readiness to adapt should market structure evolve. As always, historical patterns provide context but not certainty — careful planning and measured decision-making remain the most reliable tools in volatile markets.

Note: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

Disclaimer: This post is a compilation of publicly available information.
MEXC does not verify or guarantee the accuracy of third-party content.
Readers should conduct their own research before making any investment or participation decisions.