Washington Orders Halt to Crypto ATM Operations Over Customer Funds

Washington regulators issue emergency cease-and-desist against crypto ATM operator

Washington state authorities have issued an emergency cease-and-desist order against a prominent cash-to-crypto ATM operator after determining the company improperly treated unredeemed customer voucher balances as corporate income. The action highlights intensifying scrutiny of physical on-ramps that convert cash into digital assets, reinforces the importance of transparent custodial accounting, and signals potential wider fallout for the sector in 2025.

Key findings and regulatory action

According to the state Department of Financial Institutions (DFI), the operator failed to segregate customer funds appropriately and was found to have recognized unclaimed or expired voucher balances as company revenue. The order alleges multiple compliance deficiencies, including:

• Misuse of consumer funds — unredeemed voucher balances recorded as corporate income rather than held as customer property;
• Inadequate consumer disclosures and support — some vouchers displayed defunct support contact information;
• Record-keeping and reporting lapses — inaccurate filings and deficiencies in required financial documentation;
• Net worth shortfalls — failure to maintain the minimum financial thresholds set for licensed money transmitters.

The emergency order immediately prohibited the provider from engaging in money-transmission activities in Washington and from accepting new funds from state residents. Regulators indicated they will pursue restitution for affected customers and could move to revoke the firm’s state money-transmitter license.

Consumer protection at the center

State officials emphasized that protecting consumers who rely on licensed entities to handle cash-to-crypto conversions was the priority. The findings suggest customers who purchased vouchers at kiosks but never redeemed them may be entitled to refunds, and affected consumers have been advised to prepare claims.

Why this matters to the market in 2025

2025 has seen a continuation of heightened regulatory activity across the crypto ecosystem, particularly targeting on-ramps and entities that touch fiat. Several trends make this enforcement action especially significant:

• Regulatory realignment: In the wake of prior industry disruptions, federal and state authorities have sharpened enforcement and clarified expectations for money-transmission, custody, and unclaimed property rules.
• Increased consumer scrutiny: Cash-to-crypto kiosks remain a critical access point for retail users; any lapses in consumer protections can materially undermine confidence in those channels.
• Compliance cost pressures: Higher standards for record-keeping, escrow accounting, and net-worth requirements are raising operational costs and could accelerate consolidation among compliant operators.
• Cross-jurisdiction enforcement: States are coordinating more closely with federal guidance, leading to faster, more decisive enforcement when systemic or consumer-harm risks are identified.

Taken together, these dynamics mean the long-term winners in the on-ramp market will likely be firms that combine scalable kiosk networks with rigorous compliance frameworks and clear consumer protections.

Implications for crypto ATM operators

Operators that provide cash-to-crypto services should treat this development as a compliance warning sign. Specific areas of focus include:

• Escrow and custodial accounting — maintain clear separation between customer funds and corporate revenue; unredeemed voucher balances should be tracked as customer property or handled in accordance with unclaimed property statutes.
• Robust disclosures — ensure voucher and kiosk displays give current, functioning support channels and transparent redemption terms.
• Accurate record-keeping and filings — establish reliable reconciliation processes and timely regulatory submissions to demonstrate solvency and compliance.
• Maintain regulatory capital — meet or exceed net-worth requirements to avoid license vulnerabilities.
• Consumer remediation plans — have clear procedures to respond to unredeemed funds, including proactive outreach, refund mechanisms, and established claims processes.

Operators should view compliance as a core business function, not merely a regulatory checkbox. The public nature of state actions means reputational damage can be swift and long-lasting if consumer funds are perceived to be at risk.

Advice for consumers who used crypto ATMs

If you used a cash-to-crypto ATM and purchased a voucher that was never redeemed, consider the following steps:

• Check the operator’s license status with your state regulator.
• Keep any receipts, voucher codes, and transaction details; these are essential for submitting claims or seeking refunds.
• Contact the operator via the most current public channels and document all communications.
• File a claim with the state regulator if directed or when the regulator announces a restitution process.
• Monitor public notices from the regulator for timelines and instructions on seeking refunds.

Prompt action and careful record-keeping will help consumers assert their rights should the firm be required to provide restitution or if a receivership process begins.

Regulatory expectations and compliance best practices

Regulators expect money transmitters and on-ramps to adhere to standards similar to traditional financial firms. These expectations include:

• Clear segregation and accounting of custodial funds;
• Timely and accurate regulatory reporting;
• Robust anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) programs;
• Effective customer support and dispute-resolution procedures;
• Procedures for handling unclaimed property under state law.

For many operators, implementing automated reconciliation systems, third-party audits, and insured custody arrangements can reduce risk and demonstrate compliance to regulators and customers alike.

Broader market impact and outlook

The enforcement action underscores structural shifts sweeping the crypto ecosystem in 2025. Market participants and observers should expect:

• Tighter oversight of fiat on-ramps, particularly those accepting cash;
• Greater emphasis on state-level unclaimed property laws as applied to digital-asset voucher systems;
• Heightened due diligence by payment processors, financial institutions, and partners that integrate with kiosk networks;
• Potential consolidation as smaller or undercapitalized operators exit or are acquired by better-capitalized firms with compliant infrastructures;
• Innovation in compliance tooling — including real-time reconciliation, tokenized custody, and insurance solutions that can restore consumer confidence.

From a user-adoption perspective, transparent, licensed channels are likely to attract more retail users and institutional partners. Conversely, fragmentation and enforcement uncertainty could create temporary liquidity disruptions for certain local markets served primarily by kiosk networks.

What this means for the future of crypto on-ramps

As digital-assets markets mature, regulatory frameworks will continue to evolve. In 2025, policymakers are balancing consumer protection with the desire to foster innovation. The recent action in Washington demonstrates that regulators will act decisively when they identify practices that endanger consumer assets or misrepresent a firm’s financial position.

Operators that embrace best practices — such as safeguarding customer funds, maintaining transparent disclosures, and investing in compliance infrastructure — will be best positioned to scale responsibly. Consumers who use cash-to-crypto services should prioritize providers that make compliance and transparency demonstrable.

Final thoughts

The Washington enforcement action serves as a reminder that the governance, accounting, and operational practices of crypto on-ramps are now under sustained regulatory scrutiny. For the industry to maintain healthy growth in 2025 and beyond, robust consumer protections, accurate financial reporting, and up-to-date support resources are essential. Market participants and users alike should watch for further developments and be prepared for a regulatory environment that demands higher standards of accountability and transparency.

Disclaimer: This post is a compilation of publicly available information.
MEXC does not verify or guarantee the accuracy of third-party content.
Readers should conduct their own research before making any investment or participation decisions.